Which is cheaper, Verda (DataCrunch) 8H100.80S.176V · 8x H100 SXM5 80GB or Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu?

Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu, at $2.99/GPU-hr against $3.30/GPU-hr, both the on-demand rate for one GPU for one hour, read on 17 Sept 2026. On the whole machine that is $23.92/hr against $26.38/hr.

Which holds more GPU memory?

Both add up to 640 GB across the instance, at 80 GB and 80 GB a board.

What would a week cost?

$4,432 for Verda (DataCrunch) 8H100.80S.176V · 8x H100 SXM5 80GB and $4,019 for Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu, at 168 hours of the whole machine at its published rate, with no commitment discount. Where a spot rate is published the same week costs less and the machine can be taken back mid-run.

What does the hourly price leave out?

Verda (DataCrunch) 8H100.80S.176V · 8x H100 SXM5 80GB: disk none, billed separately, no regions published, billed per hour. Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu: disk 960 GB, no regions published, billed per hour. Egress and tax are extra on both.

Verda (DataCrunch) 8H100.80S.176V · 8x H100 SXM5 80GB vs Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu.

machine vs machine · prices as of 17 Sept 2026

The same H100 SXM at two providers, so the board is identical and everything else is not. Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu takes 2 of 4 rounds against Verda (DataCrunch) 8H100.80S.176V · 8x H100 SXM5 80GB. It is also the cheaper of the two by the hour, at $2.99/GPU-hr against $3.30/GPU-hr.

Verda (DataCrunch)

8H100.80S.176V · 8x H100 SXM5 80GB

$3.30/GPU-hr

$26.38/hr for the machine · $4,432 a week · $1.65 spot

8x H100 SXM · 80 GB each · $0.0412/GB-hr

Verda (DataCrunch) ↗

Vultrwins 2 rounds

vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu

$2.99/GPU-hr

$23.92/hr for the machine · $4,019 a week

8x H100 SXM · 80 GB each · $0.0374/GB-hr

Vultr ↗

Price per GPU-hour (lower wins)

$3.30/GPU-hr

$2.99/GPU-hr

Interruptible rate (lower wins)

$1.65/GPU-hr

not published

Price per GB of VRAM (lower wins)

$0.0412/GB-hr

$0.0374/GB-hr

VRAM per GPU

80 GB

GPUs per instance

8x H100 SXM

vCPU

176

112

RAM

1360 GB

2015 GB

Included storage

none · volumes extra

960 GB

Regions listed

regions not stated

What a run costs on each

An hour of the machine$26.38/hr vs $23.92/hr
A day$633 vs $574
A week$4,432 vs $4,019
A week on spot$2,216 vs not published

Verda (DataCrunch) then Vultr, at the published rate with no commitment discount

Go further

open in the compare tool →every price for the H100 SXM

Add a third or fourth machine, or switch the weighting, in the tool.

Frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Verda (DataCrunch) 8H100.80S.176V · 8x H100 SXM5 80GB or Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu?: Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu, at $2.99/GPU-hr against $3.30/GPU-hr, both the on-demand rate for one GPU for one hour, read on 17 Sept 2026. On the whole machine that is $23.92/hr against $26.38/hr.
Which holds more GPU memory?: Both add up to 640 GB across the instance, at 80 GB and 80 GB a board.
What would a week cost?: $4,432 for Verda (DataCrunch) 8H100.80S.176V · 8x H100 SXM5 80GB and $4,019 for Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu, at 168 hours of the whole machine at its published rate, with no commitment discount. Where a spot rate is published the same week costs less and the machine can be taken back mid-run.
What does the hourly price leave out?: Verda (DataCrunch) 8H100.80S.176V · 8x H100 SXM5 80GB: disk none, billed separately, no regions published, billed per hour. Vultr vbm-112c-2048gb-8-h100-gpu: disk 960 GB, no regions published, billed per hour. Egress and tax are extra on both.

Every rate is the on-demand price for one GPU for one hour, read 17 Sept 2026 from each provider's own page, so a node of eight is compared at what one of its GPUs costs. Storage, egress and tax are extra unless a row says otherwise, and reserved or committed rates are not indexed. Bars are scaled to the larger value in each row.