Which is cheaper, Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX or Verda (DataCrunch) 1H200.141S.44V · 1x H200 SXM5 141GB?

Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX, at $4.29/GPU-hr against $4.33/GPU-hr, both the on-demand rate for one GPU for one hour, read on 17 Sept 2026. On the whole machine that is $4.29/hr against $4.33/hr.

Which holds more GPU memory?

Both add up to 141 GB across the instance, at 141 GB and 141 GB a board.

What would a week cost?

$721 for Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX and $727 for Verda (DataCrunch) 1H200.141S.44V · 1x H200 SXM5 141GB, at 168 hours of the whole machine at its published rate, with no commitment discount. Where a spot rate is published the same week costs less and the machine can be taken back mid-run.

What does the hourly price leave out?

Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX: disk none, billed separately, no regions published, billed per hour. Verda (DataCrunch) 1H200.141S.44V · 1x H200 SXM5 141GB: disk none, billed separately, no regions published, billed per hour. Egress and tax are extra on both.

Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX vs Verda (DataCrunch) 1H200.141S.44V · 1x H200 SXM5 141GB.

machine vs machine · prices as of 17 Sept 2026

The same H200 SXM at two providers, so the board is identical and everything else is not. Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX takes 2 of 4 rounds against Verda (DataCrunch) 1H200.141S.44V · 1x H200 SXM5 141GB. It is also the cheaper of the two by the hour, at $4.29/GPU-hr against $4.33/GPU-hr.

Crusoewins 2 rounds

NVIDIA H200 HGX

$4.29/GPU-hr

$4.29/hr for the machine · $721 a week

1x H200 SXM · 141 GB each · $0.0304/GB-hr

Crusoe ↗

Verda (DataCrunch)

1H200.141S.44V · 1x H200 SXM5 141GB

$4.33/GPU-hr

$4.33/hr for the machine · $727 a week · $2.16 spot

1x H200 SXM · 141 GB each · $0.0307/GB-hr

Verda (DataCrunch) ↗

Price per GPU-hour (lower wins)

$4.29/GPU-hr

$4.33/GPU-hr

Interruptible rate (lower wins)

not published

$2.16/GPU-hr

Price per GB of VRAM (lower wins)

$0.0304/GB-hr

$0.0307/GB-hr

VRAM per GPU

141 GB

GPUs per instance

1x H200 SXM

vCPU

not stated

RAM

not stated

170 GB

Included storage

none · volumes extra

Regions listed

regions not stated

What a run costs on each

An hour of the machine$4.29/hr vs $4.33/hr
A day$103 vs $104
A week$721 vs $727
A week on spotnot published vs $364

Crusoe then Verda (DataCrunch), at the published rate with no commitment discount

Go further

open in the compare tool →every price for the H200 SXM

Add a third or fourth machine, or switch the weighting, in the tool.

Frequently asked

Which is cheaper, Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX or Verda (DataCrunch) 1H200.141S.44V · 1x H200 SXM5 141GB?: Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX, at $4.29/GPU-hr against $4.33/GPU-hr, both the on-demand rate for one GPU for one hour, read on 17 Sept 2026. On the whole machine that is $4.29/hr against $4.33/hr.
Which holds more GPU memory?: Both add up to 141 GB across the instance, at 141 GB and 141 GB a board.
What would a week cost?: $721 for Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX and $727 for Verda (DataCrunch) 1H200.141S.44V · 1x H200 SXM5 141GB, at 168 hours of the whole machine at its published rate, with no commitment discount. Where a spot rate is published the same week costs less and the machine can be taken back mid-run.
What does the hourly price leave out?: Crusoe NVIDIA H200 HGX: disk none, billed separately, no regions published, billed per hour. Verda (DataCrunch) 1H200.141S.44V · 1x H200 SXM5 141GB: disk none, billed separately, no regions published, billed per hour. Egress and tax are extra on both.

Every rate is the on-demand price for one GPU for one hour, read 17 Sept 2026 from each provider's own page, so a node of eight is compared at what one of its GPUs costs. Storage, egress and tax are extra unless a row says otherwise, and reserved or committed rates are not indexed. Bars are scaled to the larger value in each row.